<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bonehead Environmental Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blurtdaily.com/2009/10/06/bonehead-environmental-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blurtdaily.com/2009/10/06/bonehead-environmental-policies/</link>
	<description>&#124; opinion and more opinion &#124;</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.blurtdaily.com/2009/10/06/bonehead-environmental-policies/#comment-8478</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blurtdaily.com/?p=1497#comment-8478</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I totally agree with Dana.  I hate it when people say you can't tell a difference in the light.  You can!!  

I am not opposed to alternative energy in principal.  Why can't we develop cleaner technologies that don't have negative consequences?  That's how science and technology develop, constantly improving and becoming more efficient.  But until we find a true alternative energy source that is better, nuclear is the way to go for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I totally agree with Dana.  I hate it when people say you can&#8217;t tell a difference in the light.  You can!!  </p>
<p>I am not opposed to alternative energy in principal.  Why can&#8217;t we develop cleaner technologies that don&#8217;t have negative consequences?  That&#8217;s how science and technology develop, constantly improving and becoming more efficient.  But until we find a true alternative energy source that is better, nuclear is the way to go for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dana</title>
		<link>http://www.blurtdaily.com/2009/10/06/bonehead-environmental-policies/#comment-8474</link>
		<dc:creator>dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blurtdaily.com/?p=1497#comment-8474</guid>
		<description>and can we add that they're just plain ugly?  I refuse to buy them b/c I do not want an ugly 3rd-world flourescent light glow in my front room.  I'll stick with incandescent thank you.  And this just solidifies it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and can we add that they&#8217;re just plain ugly?  I refuse to buy them b/c I do not want an ugly 3rd-world flourescent light glow in my front room.  I&#8217;ll stick with incandescent thank you.  And this just solidifies it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.blurtdaily.com/2009/10/06/bonehead-environmental-policies/#comment-8467</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blurtdaily.com/?p=1497#comment-8467</guid>
		<description>As usual, government is the problem, not the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, government is the problem, not the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
